Inspection-ready scope
Existing and proposed ratings, equipment, circuits, grounding, and service work should be explicit.
A Prospect Heights panel scope should be written so the inspector, owner, and electrician are discussing the same equipment and sequence. AGE separates diagnosis, panel replacement, service revision, circuit corrections, and restoration before the controlled outage.
Send the address or ZIP, equipment goal, panel photos, and route or access details. AGE Electric will confirm what can be priced remotely and what needs an on-site review.
Comparable northwest-suburban planning bands are about $2,000–$6,000 for a subpanel, $3,500–$8,500+ for a panel replacement, and $5,500–$12,000+ for a broader service revision. The quote must say whether it adds circuit space, replaces distribution equipment, or actually changes utility-service capacity.
Straightforward panel replacement field work may fit in one scheduled workday, but the controlled outage is only one part of the timeline. Permit review, equipment availability, utility coordination, service conductors, meter work, relocation, grounding corrections, and inspections can extend the calendar schedule or require additional workdays.
The property, equipment, access, existing conditions, permit, utility, and restoration scope determine AGE Electric’s quote.
These are property and planning conditions—not generic city-name substitutions.
Existing and proposed ratings, equipment, circuits, grounding, and service work should be explicit.
Permit review and designated inspection availability can be longer than the field outage.
Accessible issues discovered during transfer should be documented and resolved before affected work is covered.
Prospect Heights publishes permit and inspection requirements, including advance scheduling and specific electrical-inspection windows. Inspection availability should be built into the project calendar before finishes close or a service outage is promised.
City of Prospect Heights Building PermitsEach band carries assumptions. A low number and a high number are not comparable if one omits permits, routing, equipment, restoration, or enabling work.
| Comparable scope | Planning range | What it assumes | What can change it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subpanel installation | $2,000–$6,000 | Additional distribution with adequate upstream service and a defined feeder route | A subpanel creates circuit space; it does not automatically increase service capacity |
| Panel replacement | $3,500–$8,500+ | Comparable equipment replacement, circuit transfer, labeling, grounding review, permit, and testing | Meter, service lateral, relocation, exterior restoration, and utility work may be separate |
| Broader service revision | $5,500–$12,000+ | Service equipment, conductors, meter, exterior routing, or substantial corrections | Utility requirements, underground work, property conditions, and restoration materially change cost |
Use this list to compare the same work from one proposal to another and to expose missing assumptions before the project starts.
These answers keep capacity, access, approvals, cost, and timing visible instead of hiding them behind “it depends.”
Confirm the City’s current notice and inspection windows once the permit and work sequence are known. The outage, inspection, reconnection, and finish work should be coordinated—not booked as unrelated events.
A panel generally does not create energy savings by itself. It may address condition, safety, distribution, or capacity, while actual usage and utility rates drive the bill.
It may solve a distribution-space problem, but it cannot create upstream capacity. A load calculation and equipment review determine whether the existing service supports the planned loads.
The controlled outage depends on equipment, circuit condition, utility and inspection sequence, and corrections discovered after opening. The proposal should distinguish outage time from total project lead time.